Below is the code for which i am getting Divide by 0 error.
Can some one please help me to bypass this?
IF {@k_Average Complete Premise Time} = 0 THEN 0
ELSE({@k_Notn cmpl Prms} + {@k_no notification job}) * ({@k_Average Complete Premise Time}/{@K_Avg Hrs Notif Tsk Grp})
Hi
We would like to purchase the subscription for one CAL instance to start our implementation project (3 months), then, migrate from CAL 9AWS) to our On-Premise infrastructure. Can we do this?
Thanks
Sasha Nunes
Hi,
It is in a production order transaction CO02, field AUDISP table RESBD. We want to change this field form the value proposed form the customizing due to this field is not modified after add a new component or operation. Customizing propose value 1 never for this order type and we want to change to 3 immediately.
Thank you.
BR.
Check your status profile to see how you can void the dispute.
Normally you can only move to a void status based on the status profile values.
You can only close a dispute once it has been paid - and therefore the open amount in dispute will be zero - however it will record the fact you disputed it - therefore the disputed amount will not change
Hello all
I have a very strange issue with RD04 message. I have 3 inter-company suppliers selling to the one and same partner. For two of them the process works as expected, in the sense that output is sent and the resulting EDI message generates the FI vendor invoice but in the case of the third LI partner the output fails - no iDoc is generated - with the following message
Entry in outbound table not found
Message no. E0400
Diagnosis
No partner profile (outbound parameter) could be found using the following key:
/MAGNAT/KU/RE/INVOIC/XXX///
This refers to the key fields in table EDP13:
Needless to say that I checked and re-checked for days all the configurations and details of all 3 partner profiles and found no difference. I even deleted both partner profiles - the one belonging to the third LI vendor and the KU customer - and recreated them but in vane, no change has been noticed.
The most intriguing part of the error message is the "XXX". I never used that for the message code I\m assuming that's the corresponding field - but still, somehow the system is looking for it. I even added XXX to the message code but that only increased the confusion: the error message looked like this:
/MEGAT/KU/RE/INVOIC/XXX/XXX// suggesting that first XXX is not used for Message code.
Can someone make any sense out of the above?
Thank you.
Please mark this Discussion with a Correct Answer and Helpful Answer where appropriate. See http://scn.sap.com/community/support/blog/2013/04/03/how-to-close-a-discussion-and-why Even if you discovered the solution without any outside contributions, it helps others to understand what the solution turned out to be.
Regards, Mike (Moderator)
SAP Technology RIG
Hi ,
We have two custom fields in the time sheet app,but when i am trying to enter the values it is giving the error Property"Filedname" is invalid,any ideas how can i resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Mohan
Message was edited by: Michael Appleby
Again - thank you to all who contributed.
Unnikrishnan - your query provided them with what they needed in a very generic but understandable way. They can now manipulate in excel anyway they want to.
I look forward to expanding my skills by through the various posts and explanations.
Again - many thanks to the community for helping me with this query.
Keith H
Thanks for assistance.
Janie
Thank you for your response.
Janie
Hello Lorenzo,
I guess you are a developer like me. In that case I would note down all values I am passing to the BAPI and will ask the functional person to create a delivery for me manually. If he has to use additional data I will try to pass those to the BAPI as well.
Rgds,
Vijay.
Hello again Raghu!
Currently this is the situation: The Switch Procedure was activated for this system and all of the data were inside the secondary tables (SXMSPMAST2, etc.).
So, I executed the deletion procedure (RSXMB_DELETE_MESSAGES and RSXMB_TABLE_SWITCH). The job has been running for 93,616 seconds (26 hours) and has copied 3,201,788 messages.
What I was expecting is that the Switch Procedure only copies an small amount of messages (the ones on the retention period) and then drop the secondary tables (deleting 18 million messages). But no, for some reason that I cannot understand I believe that the Switch Procedure is going to copy these 18 million messages.
As the documents you have sent, I also understand that the messages should be deleted. But this is not happening.
Why?? Am I missing something??
thanks
Carlos
Hi again Jacobo,
Thanks for voting my idea ! only 3 votes to go before it's being considered for review!
Best regards
Antoine
Hi Alan,
It is probably maximized for 254 characters within B1 query. If it is over the limits, it will be truncated.
Try to add another column using a formula such as by testing:
SELECT Substring(Notes,255,254) FROM OCLG
WHERE Len(Notes)>254
Thanks,
Gordon
Check in OMS2 whether you maintained the quantity and value update settings for your plant
Thanks Rob,
Something must have kicked into gear as I got an email from the local SAP guys.
I will revert back to dealing with them and find out about the e-learning as it would be a better fit for me right now. If I don't come right I will let you know.
Thanks for all the help...I find trying to get information on education/certification on the SAP site difficult, but I appreciate it.
Cheers,
Craig
Hi
Please check if the parameter id WLC or FZ5 can help you achieve that. If these parameter id are assigned then you can make available Complete for parking button. This is also controlled through FB00
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
Dear Edy,
Thank you for your answer. I have checked it.
The udf data type is unit and total. The structure is Amount. So, it will be Numeric (19,6)
In the vb.net, I set as decimal as follows:
Dim oResource As Decimal = 0
After I change to the data type unit and total with structure amount, the new error message appears as follows:
Pls help to solve this issue. Thank you
Rgds,
Steve
Boris/ Megha,
Thanks to both of you for your help.
I have verified that we have not installed the UAL AFL and I am going to have the HANA guys installed it. I will keep you posted.
Boris,
I don't see 1.302 anymore there is 1.303.1 or 1.304, Can I go with either?
Thanks
Gaurav
The docu is very clear, precondition is the deletion indicator in the call off (or even all call offs are already archived)
Deletion Criteria for MM_EKKO (MM-PUR) - Materials Management (MM) - SAP Library
