I'm still getting this behaviour now - the push action not respecting the IF and executing anyway even if the IF condition is not true. I've created an OSS message...
Steve.
I'm still getting this behaviour now - the push action not respecting the IF and executing anyway even if the IF condition is not true. I've created an OSS message...
Steve.
As per my understanding both Poland & Finland are part of EU for most of the common multinational European organizations and agreements.
Following queries are out of my curioucity of learning.
Can share what is that
certain tax problems
between Poland & Finland
And why your client want to go for
cross company consignment process
Instead of cross company sales or inter-company stock transfer.
Is this something related to APO? Like http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/d1/ddde81bedf11d4b579006094b9b9dd/frameset.htm
Can you tell us the client industry?
In anticipation.
Thanks & Regards, JP
Dear Letlapa,
Actually you requirement is no clear.
I recommend have more explanation of your requirement not what you have done already.
Please put a sample case also to have better understand of the issue.
Regards,
Omid
Hi,
Please post more details or the log which it cancelled from the SUM log direcory.
What's the current tp tool as this phase just check the tp tool and get some details.
Please check there is not error log in the trans directory.
Like:
Running /usr/sap/SID/DVEBMGSXX/exe/tp pf=/DIR_PUT/SUM/abap/var/DEFAULT.TPP checkimpdp SID
Running /usr/sap/SID/DVEBMGSXX/exe/tp pf=/DIR_PUT/SUM/abap/var/TOOLIMPD.TPP put SID
Analyzing result of tp call ...
Running /usr/sap/SID/DVEBMGSXX/exe/tp pf=/DIR_PUT/SUM/abap/var/DEFAULT.TPP getconvent SID
Please check the TP in your kernel directory.
Thanks
Rishi Abrol
Hi Hasan,
i need your help, could u please send me that exact code what you wrote inside that method. i dont know exact line where to insert ur piece of code. could u plz guide and help me. i am struggling to close this issue. send some screen shot for me...
Thanks,
anbu
Also,could you please let me know whether the LR version 11.0 has got any option for auto correlation(SAP portal application) like we do it for .net application. Regards Aromal R
Ah, there's a note now: 1883576 https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1883576
But basically it recommends to use another release until Oracle fixes the bug:
"Bug on the Oracle side - see JDK-8017776 : Swing Event Thread does not use JNLP class loader"
which Oracle promised to do in 7u40.
Hi Ruhail,
Not sure you can obtain the value thru standard operation. Two things:
Furthermore, WPBP splits separate pay change within the same payroll split and are caused by changes over the payroll period made in infotypes 0000, 0001, 0007, 0008 and 0027 (and eventually 0014 depending on your payroll scheme setup).
Payroll splits create separated payroll result within a payroll period and are caused by infotype 0000 changes [according to your configuration in Action Indicator 'Payroll Split' (V_530_E)] and payroll area changes in infotype 0001.
So you can have one or various WPBP splits within one payroll split and one or various payroll splits within one payroll period.
Typically re-hire will provoke a payroll split although it might depend on your country-specific practice. –meaning your last active period is within a different payroll result-
You should weight in your requirements and see which between a custom payroll operation and payroll function best fit your need. But in any case it means ABAP code to obtain “actual” payroll result (taking into account the payroll buffer) and backwardly evaluates what entry matches the last active period (if it does not correspond to your current period of course).
Can you specify a little further your requirements?
Regards,
Antoine
By the way, If your requirement is about overtime allowance have a look at a similar discussion and my reply for it.
http://scn.sap.com/message/14056988#14056988
Regards,
Omid
Hello guys,
We have some Raw materials for which we need to apply recurring inspection.
1. Inspection interval in QM view: 730 Days.
2. 09 Inspection type active in QM Setup.
3. Next Inspection date for Batch is calculated at the time of Creating batch i.e Goods receipt.
A. Manufacture has Expiry period of 730 days for Same material.
B. Suppose, manufacturing Date is 22.04.2013 so Manufacture's SLED is approx 21.04.2015 (is also recorded in GR Doc.)
C. We have done GR on 09.08.2013, So Next inspection Date for the Batch is 08.08.2015. Which i guess is not accurate at all.(Technically it is right though)
We want Next Inspection Date to get updated as 21.04.2013.
Is there any Solution?
Regards,
Amol Manave
The following source code:-
*RUN_PROGRAM CURR_CONVERSION
CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
SCOPE = %SCOPE_SET%
TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
OTHER = [ENTITY=%ENTITY_SET%]
R_ENTITY = GLOBAL
*ENDRUN_PROGRAM
Regards,
Sagar dev
Sorry G Lakshmipathi but we have a special tax in Tunisia called "Stamp Fees". This tax is only related to the customer for every invoice posted. (0,400 TND for every invoice depending on customer, the Ministry of Defense don't pay it for example)
It has nothing to do with the materials. All you said is true about taxation and you didn't have to explain this basic concept but thanks for that.
I'm only searching for a system issue to avoid the material classification.
We have included INCLUDE RESERVATIONS and SALES REQUIREMENTS it makes no difference still not reserved
Hi All,
Can anybody help?
Hi Katrice,
Try ON_DATA_CHECK. If that too doesn't fire when you want, you may want to create an event handler method for each of the ALV events and set breakpoints in them just to see when they fire and find out if any of the ALV events can be used for what you want.
Also, if you want to capture the date value right after F4 help, the view's hook method wddomodifyview may work for you if no ALV event does since it gets executed upon return from F4 help.
Cheers,
Amy
Hi,
I think you can try using window.onerror function.
Regards,
Padma
Dear Dawn
Please check the price control in mm02 of 5* materials, it should be 'V' If you want to ignore 5* materials during costing run you can mark them 'DO NOT COST' by ticking indicator at costing 1 tab of material master. Thus the individual materials will not be costed during costing run but their cost will be included in costing of FG material.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
Hi Udi,
thanks a lot. The senario is quite easy. You have 2 table. The first with 3 column : A, B and C and the second with 3 Column A, B and D. The Column A and B form both table are the same with the same content. I need to have a new table with the column A, B, C, D with merge Column A and B.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Valérie
Hi,
You could do Code Inspector Check - Transaction SIC.
Regards,
Kiran