Hi Inaki,
thanks!
Yes I tried this before, but also the same effect.
I had a look in the sxmb_moni and there everything looks fine
but the file in attached to the mail is without declaration and instruction.
It seems like the mail adapter deletes everything in front of the first tag..
Good morning Pascal,
Yes finally it WORKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 
. I knew it was bound to the context somehow but I was still trying to figure it out. THANK YOU SO MUCH for your PRECIOUS time, I am truly GRATEFUL. Have a great day and stay blessed
Hi Anish,
Could you find the t-codes and auth. objects that VIM has. So, you need not upload all the auth. objects in SU24. you may only modify those applicable for VIM.
Could you share the t-codes and auth. objects affected.
Regards
Plaban
Hello Jaffer,
if you have no idea what a X.509 certificate exactly is and how it is used, it will be difficult to answer to your question because such an answer implies that you have understood the concepts. As long as this is not the case, the explanations will not help you. So my recommendation is: Familiarize yourself with the topic, learn the basic concepts. I'm sure that afterwards you will have different questions if there are topics left at all for clarification.
Best regards,
Markus
HI,
Is it possible to do the same through new notification type ?.
Regards,
JJ Roy
Hi,
I don't find any information about the general availability of BI 4.2 for all customers.
Is there any information about this?
Regards,
Zaki
Hi,
Please try the BADI: FI_HEADER_SUB_1300
Regards,
Renjith Michael
Hi
That is the reason, I requested you to process the batch session in foreground and see why system is not proposing the open items. It is difficult to point out a solution unless I know a detailed error.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
Hi Vinay,
Please can you check below setups -
a) QM View should be created in 'receiving plant', and you have added inspection type 01/02/08 (relevant one). Also in material master quality view Post to inspection stock check box is active, in order to post the incoming stock to quality stock.
b) Please confirm what is STO process followed in your case. If movement types 351 / 641 / 643 / 645 / 647 are used, then they are tagged with inspection lot origin '02', related to goods Issue. For GR, check the MvT 101, inspection type 01.
c) In case you are using SD process for STO, please check assignment of inspection lot origin in SD delivery type in OQL8.
d) Movement type in use should not be blocked form inspection lot creation -
SPRO ---> Quality Management => Quality Inspection => Inspection for Goods Movements => Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type => Should be unchecked in order to get this created.
Thanks,
Arijit
Hi Nihal,
we faced the same problem while creating requests with web services but only for Business roles in AC 10.1. Our problem was, that we submitted values like Business Process or Functional area which does not exist in the customizing. You can also check these values in table GRACREQ.
After deleting or eliminating this value in the web service request we are able to find the request.
Maybe this is a solution.
Best regards,
Dirk
Dear Sagar,
That will not work, logical link means when you click on any link in Web UI (let say servicepro->servicerequest->search), as you click on search logical link, service request search page will be open in same window (l-Shape area) but here i want in different window (just like in new TAB).
Hope now question is cleared.
Please do not suggest Component popup,
HI, I think it's a little bit late but I had the same problem.
The step RSGET_SMSY was running with STEP-USER SOLMAN_BTC, after replacing the USER with SOLMAN_ADMIN the JOB was running without errors.
Best regards
Lukas
Hi Anindya,
Thanks for your valuable help. i applied your code but it still show me the same Error
Hi everyone,
I wanna learn about relationship between sql server and sap while using web service to get data from sql server.
Im kinda new about web services so I need little bit preinformation.
Firstly ? Which scenarios may occur between those two system,
Secondly? What is the all steps to follow while creating web service to fetch data from sql server
any help or suggestion will be appreciate .
thank u
best regards.
Experts,
I have several products in ERP, all without batch mangement required flag.
Today I ciffed them first time - in EWM, all these products have the flag (so batch is required).
Question is - why the flag is set? Any ideas?
Thanks
Michael
Dear All,
Please provide me some inputs on the above.
Rgds,
JJ Roy
Did you read F1 help for account group? think it like this will you be able to have different pricing for different group of customers like wholesale, retail, corporate, in-house based on account group only? I'm sure you'll be able to dig the ans now. Thanks.
Rajat Ganguly assignment in OVT0 is for setting up the default value of customer pricing procedure which means that you don't have to enter the customer pricing procedure again and again while creating customer master from XD01 this works best where pricing schema calculation is based on only one customer pricing procedure.
In case if business requirement is that pricing has to be different for a group of customers then obviously there will be multiple customer pricing procedures like for standard, in-house employees, group dealers etc and for such requirement it would be better to get it assigned in XD01 instead of setting the default value in OVT0. Hope it would be clear. In case you need more clarification on this please feel free to ask. Thanks.
Anyway, on top of your installation issues you have incorrect values in PERIOD property!
I am glad that you managed to get it working.
The best way to see whether you need to do something in addition, is to test the outcome with different combinations of materials and quantities.
You need to get this to work as an end-to-end process, so test all from sales order creation (no idea if you use CRM for example) to final billing. Check also the printouts.
