Hi Ranu,
What is the JE effect if you choose Complete instead of reject ?
Also I think You may be using Set GL account by warehouse..
Please advise.
Thanks,
Harshal
Hi Ranu,
What is the JE effect if you choose Complete instead of reject ?
Also I think You may be using Set GL account by warehouse..
Please advise.
Thanks,
Harshal
Hi,
I need some suggestions, Facing one problem,
My Client is Creating almost 500 materials, Every day. They don't want to Create through the manually.
From different department people are need the materials Not a single person Creating the materials. We decided to Given bdc for creating the material.
For fixing the properties of the materials. While restricting the Material properties, We don't want to give MM01 Authorization to the users.
I Completed Recording And Checking in Quality. But while executing the T-code it is saying No Authorization.
I hope They don't have authorization. How could these people create the materials Without authorization.
Need Valuable suggestions.
PCo: 15.1.1.2634
MII: 15.1.0.3 and 15.0.5.4
Dear Zarun
Plz Extend Fwd consumption period 200 and check .
Hi Nr Tk.
If I understand well your problem, in Cockpit (CKMLCP) you carry out step Mark Future prices. This means that, your Periodic Unit price calculated in March will be marked as future standard price and to be released in the future.
If that's your case, you cannot release periodic unit price from march in April, because when you carry out Material Ledger from March you are already in April, so the price is marked as future price to be released on May, 1st (you have to schedule it in CKME transaction).
Probably your April's standard price is exactly the Periodic Unit Price from February, if you have marked it in February's Material Ledger and released it on CKME.
Let me know if I understood well your problem.
Regards
Leandro Calvi
I ran into the same problem with the same error, but making use of the HCAGGLOMERATE method (agglomerative clustering).
Pay attention to how the wrapper procedure is called, it not uses always the parameters in the same order. For instance, I was expecting it to run like this in HCP:
CALL "HCP"."HCP_AFL_WRAPPER_GENERATOR"('AFLPAL','HCAGGLOMERATE','<own name for procedure>',PDATA_TBL);
but was getting exactly the same error.
In the end it was
CALL "HCP"."HCP_AFL_WRAPPER_GENERATOR"('<own name for procedure>','AFLPAL','HCAGGLOMERATE',PDATA_TBL);
that was expected.
In your case
CALL SYS.AFLLANG_WRAPPER_PROCEDURE_CREATE('AFLPAL', 'CREATEBPNN', '<schema_name>', '<procedure_name>', <signature_table>);
is expected.
Check if your order is correct, that's what helped in my case.
Regards, Tomas
Hi,
Can you please elaborate on getting ORDER_POSNR_NV (APLZL) from table AFVC using ORDER_NUMBER_NV (AUFPL) and VORNR as there is no VORNR is the FMDERIVE source in AFVC table look up. Also there is no VORNR equivalent in the COBL structure for target of AFVC table look up
Thanks
We need an emergency fix - how do I get one.
Thanks Shrini,
I would like to know adding of Countries China and Hong Kong for Compliance Screening
Transfer of new Hong Kong (HK) and China (CN) business partners
Transfer of new materials
Configuration of new Foreign Trade Organizations, Legal Units and Mapping
Add CN and HK to Sanctioned Party List (SPL) Legal Reg and activation
Configure and adjust Embargo Legal Regulations to meet Embargo requirements
Configure and adjust Re-Export process for transactions moving to CN and/or HK.
SAP GTS- SPL will be screened in English Only.
China and Hong Kong local laws are not in scope for license determination. China and Hong Kong will follow US Law for Re-export purposes.
So can you please provide some input aforesaid points.
Thanks
Ravi
oEvent.getParameter("selectedItem").getBindingContext().getObject()
this should work.
Hi Shweta,
If you found correct answer here, kindly mark as correct answer and close the thread.
Thanks,
Vivek
Hi Chintan,
Have you tried executing the programs mentioned in the earlier thread.
I am able to execute and successfully delete the records
Regards
Terence
Hi Amol,
I have checked the second issue as per your suggestion and it is ok for maintaining the texts. The second issue is resolved upto 70%. I think in this second issue; one more issue also there.
That is the business user raised the issue for "due package" data.
How due package data will appear in the due package coloumn.
The same data is coming in the due package coloumn in Finish Language. But in English Language it is not showing.
For the second issue related to due package data given the screenshots as above with yellow highlighted one.
pls let me know if you want screenshot again for the due package data issue. I will attach it.
For the 1st issue related user concern is from the highlighted data of the screens says that package 52 (Number)was missing under the field "Due package" in 2016 year when comparing with 2015.
How the due package data will come in to the due package coloumn.?
Please find the below screenshots highlighted the 52 number in 2015 year and 2016 year for 691 maintenance item under the maintenance plan 101 in ip03 transaction.
Thanks,
Mastan.
you are getting there....
Implement SAP Note 2026791 and 2252647 to resolve this issue.
Hi Amr
You should not have done that...
Can you not re-transport the last but one COPA Transport Request, which should restore it
Or Else, raise a SAP OSS message. Waman Shirwaicar Your Expertise may help here
Ajay M
Hi Ben,
Just so you know, if you see the image I've in my post, there is an overlap between Measure 2, Measure 3 and Measure 4 which is not how a Waterfall Chart should work. The reason for that overlap is because the sample data you provided has Negative (-ve) values for Measure 3 and hence the bar goes down instead of going up.
Make sense?
Thanks,
Mahboob Mohammed
Hello John,
Reason:The regulation requirement assigned to a central control must be belonged to one of the assigned regulations in the same central control. There doesn't have this kind of validation in the import engine, which may lead to data inconsistency in the system.
Perform the below manual activities and try again
1. Run T-code SE91, input the message class GRFN_CLM and click the change icon.
2. Create the following messages:
069 Importing is triggered from &1
070 Exit on error is on
071 Exit on error is off
072 The current importing is an initial upload
073 The indirect risk model(AS5) is used
074 The direct risk model(SAS31) is used
075 Start date is &1 and end date is &2
076 The parent &1 of regulation requirement &2 is not assigned to &3(&4)
3. Save the changes.
hope it helps
Regards
Baithi
Hello Prashant,
Regards
KJogeswaraRao