Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8667 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Receipt from production

0
0

Hi Ranu,

 

What is the JE effect if you choose Complete instead of reject ?

 

Also I think You may be using Set GL account by warehouse..

 

Please advise.

 

Thanks,

Harshal


End user need to Create Materials using Bdc without Authorization.

0
0

Hi,

I need some suggestions, Facing one problem,

My Client is Creating almost 500 materials, Every day. They don't want to Create through the manually. 

From different department people are need the materials Not a single person Creating the materials. We decided to Given bdc for creating the material.

For fixing the properties of the materials. While restricting the Material properties, We don't want to give MM01  Authorization to the users.

 

I Completed Recording And Checking in Quality. But while executing the T-code it is saying No Authorization.
I hope They don't have authorization. How could  these people create the materials Without authorization.

Need Valuable suggestions.

Re: PCo 15 - OPC,SSCE and Websockets

0
0

PCo: 15.1.1.2634

MII: 15.1.0.3 and 15.0.5.4

Re: PIR is not consuming by sales order in strategy 40 with backward consumption

0
0

Dear Zarun

             Plz Extend Fwd consumption period 200 and check .

Re: Costing run VS Material per unit price

0
0

Hi Nr Tk.

 

If I understand well your problem, in Cockpit (CKMLCP) you carry out step Mark Future prices. This means that, your Periodic Unit price calculated in March will be marked as future standard price and to be released in the future.

 

If that's your case, you cannot release periodic unit price from march in April, because when you carry out Material Ledger from March you are already in April, so the price is marked as future price to be released on May, 1st (you have to schedule it in CKME transaction).

 

Probably your April's standard price is exactly the Periodic Unit Price from February, if you have marked it in February's Material Ledger and released it on CKME.

 

Let me know if I understood well your problem.

 

Regards

 

Leandro Calvi

Re: AFL error: [423] "SYSTEM"."AFLPM_GENERATOR": line 12 col 5 (at pos 291): [423] (range 3) AFL error exception: AFL error: registration finished with errors, see indexserver trace

0
0

I ran into the same problem with the same error, but making use of the HCAGGLOMERATE method (agglomerative clustering).

 

 

Pay attention to how the wrapper procedure is called, it not uses always the parameters in the same order. For instance, I was expecting it to run like this in HCP:

CALL "HCP"."HCP_AFL_WRAPPER_GENERATOR"('AFLPAL','HCAGGLOMERATE','<own name for procedure>',PDATA_TBL);

but was getting exactly the same error.

 

 

In the end it was

CALL "HCP"."HCP_AFL_WRAPPER_GENERATOR"('<own name for procedure>','AFLPAL','HCAGGLOMERATE',PDATA_TBL);

that was expected.

 

 

In your case

CALL SYS.AFLLANG_WRAPPER_PROCEDURE_CREATE('AFLPAL', 'CREATEBPNN', '<schema_name>', '<procedure_name>', <signature_table>);

is expected.

 

 

Check if your order is correct, that's what helped in my case.

Regards, Tomas

Re: Field status for Network Activity

0
0

Hi,

 

Can you please elaborate on getting ORDER_POSNR_NV (APLZL) from table AFVC using ORDER_NUMBER_NV (AUFPL) and VORNR as there is no VORNR is the FMDERIVE source in AFVC table look up. Also there is no VORNR equivalent in the COBL structure for target of AFVC table look up

 

Thanks

Re: Sybase 16 and possible bug with isolation levels

0
0

We need an emergency fix - how do I get one.


Re: GTS Rollout compliance management

0
0

Thanks Shrini,

 

I would like to know adding of Countries China and Hong Kong for Compliance Screening

 Transfer of new Hong Kong (HK) and China (CN) business partners

 Transfer of new materials

 Configuration of new Foreign Trade Organizations, Legal Units and Mapping

 Add CN and HK to Sanctioned Party List (SPL) Legal Reg and activation

 Configure and adjust Embargo Legal Regulations to meet Embargo requirements

 Configure and adjust Re-Export process for transactions moving to CN and/or HK.

 SAP GTS- SPL will be screened in English Only.

 China and Hong Kong local laws are not in scope for license determination. China and Hong Kong will follow US Law for Re-export purposes.

 

So can you please provide some input aforesaid points.

 

Thanks

Ravi

Re: How to Get Selected item object from DropDown

0
0

oEvent.getParameter("selectedItem").getBindingContext().getObject()

this should work.

Re: Sybase 16 and possible bug with isolation levels

Re: PR closures if PR is linked to sales order

0
0

Hi Shweta,

 

 

If you found correct answer here, kindly mark as correct answer and close the thread.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Vivek

Re: Regarding SARA

0
0

Hi Chintan,

 

Have you tried executing the programs mentioned in the earlier thread.

 

I am able to execute and successfully delete the records

 

Regards

Terence

Re: Maintanance plan issue

0
0

Hi Amol,

I have checked the second issue as per your suggestion and it is ok for maintaining the texts. The second issue is resolved upto 70%. I think in this second issue; one more issue also there.

That is the business user raised the issue for "due package" data.

How due package data will appear in the due package coloumn.

 

The same data is coming in the due package coloumn in Finish Language. But in English Language it is not showing.

For the second issue related to due package data given the screenshots as above with yellow highlighted one.

pls let me know if you want screenshot again for the due package data issue. I will attach it.

 

 

For the 1st issue related user concern is from the highlighted data of the screens says that package 52 (Number)was missing under the field "Due package" in 2016 year when comparing with 2015.

How the due package data will come in to the due package coloumn.?

Please find the below screenshots highlighted the 52 number in 2015 year and 2016 year for 691 maintenance item under the maintenance plan 101 in ip03 transaction.

Mainplan3.png

Mainplan4.png

Thanks,

Mastan.

Re: SAP ui5 integration with sap portal

0
0

you are getting there....


Re: Unable to move the fields from Available to Selected fields

0
0

Implement SAP Note 2026791 and 2252647 to resolve this issue.

Re: COPA Characteristics Error KEA5

0
0

Hi Amr

 

You should not have done that...

 

Can you not re-transport the last but one COPA Transport Request, which should restore it

 

Or Else, raise a SAP OSS message. Waman Shirwaicar Your Expertise may help here

 

Ajay M

Re: Waterfall chart with multi measures

0
0

Hi Ben,

 

Just so you know, if you see the image I've in my post, there is an overlap between Measure 2, Measure 3 and Measure 4 which is not how a Waterfall Chart should work. The reason for that overlap is because the sample data you provided has Negative (-ve) values for Measure 3 and hence the bar goes down instead of going up.

 

Make sense?


Thanks,

Mahboob Mohammed

Re: Error Uploading MDUG Template

0
0

Hello John,

 

Reason:The regulation requirement assigned to a central control must be belonged to one of the assigned regulations in the same central control. There doesn't have this kind of validation in the import engine, which may lead to data inconsistency in the system.

Perform the below manual activities and try again

 

1. Run T-code SE91, input the message class GRFN_CLM and click the change icon.

 

2. Create the following messages:

069 Importing is triggered from &1

070 Exit on error is on

071 Exit on error is off

072 The current importing is an initial upload

073 The indirect risk model(AS5) is used

074 The direct risk model(SAS31) is used

075 Start date is &1 and end date is &2

076 The parent &1 of regulation requirement &2 is not assigned to &3(&4)

3. Save the changes.

 

hope it helps

 

Regards

Baithi

Re: Breakdown Indicators in Malfunction Report

0
0

Hello Prashant,


  • In fact that'sone of the good questions we have for similar SAP configurations.
  • The answer comes to my mind is SAP has given a facility to mark NON-MALFUNCTION NOTIFICATIONS too categorized as Breakdowns.
  • Means this is a facility which will not be having any impact on the MTTR, MTBR figures of the Equipment.

 

Regards

KJogeswaraRao

Viewing all 8667 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images