Hi Prasant,
I have the folder permissions. Just to explain you the scenario, we have used the 5.3 child system to connect to 10.1, we have installed 10.1 plugins and started the migration. So is there any compatiblitiy issue when we use system with 5.3 and 10.1 plug-ins installed.
Regards,
Giridhar
ya sure sir...
because, initially, the order is text and then code.
then i changed the order like,
code and then text as below.
finally i got it. 
Thank You Mr.sanjeev
Hi Raj
Yes, object dependencies are transferred with CIF of PDS to APO. Support for object dependencies in planning is limited to certain functionalities - I believe PPDS supports OD's with Variant Tables but CTM does not. Other engines like optimizer, Heuristic do not support any OD's.
Rishi Menon
Hi All,
Previously 10 plants and 20 depot plants were there with 3 different company codes in production. I activated MRP Area at client level and created MRP Area for one plant with 2 storage locations . after moved to Production, there was an issue while creating delivery against Depot Sales Order during availability check. We didn't activated MRP Views in material master for depot plants.
ATP: Error message AG211 MRP areas
so I deactivated MRP Area activation now.. Previously scheduled batch job for MRP at plant level is not working now.
Thanks,
Saravana
Hi Sb,
It would be like below.
1. CC10 should be ticked and
2.Wage type characteristics deduction WT field should be ticked.
Regards,
Sankarsan
Dev,
At my end, We done mistake while initially stock uploaded. We uploaded stock in wrong material with small letter. Now, we want to correct both the things. That's why we want to use 309 mov.
Regards,
Chetan Panchal
Hello Mohinder,
Sometimes the problem might be due to the SAP GUI version. Are you using the latest GUI version and patch level.
If not try by upgrading, also sometimes it might occur due to not proper handling of the exception.
Check the below link.
https://scn.sap.com/thread/2069170
Regards,
TP
Hi Anil,
At my end, We done mistake while initially stock uploaded. We uploaded stock in wrong material with small letter. Now, we want to correct both the things.
Regards,
Chetan Panchal
Hi Sandeep,
The thread is helpful, but my requirement is very simple.
I want to assign same product cost collector to different materials by using KKF6N.
The BDC approach will be helpful in this regard?
HI, is it necessary to do SAP certification to get a job in SAP for experienced people?
why would you have such a requirement?
with a structure of RKF1, RKF2 and RKF3, there is no way to limit the account rows like you would like to. Even the zero suppression doesn't work because the structure element in the row is not treated as a blank.
I am assuming the example you gave is just a sample and the data is actually more complicated. If not, you are better of creating selection for each account and placing them as subnodes of RKF1, 2 and 3.
If it is more complex and all you are doing is grouping accounts, you may think of creating a hierarchy on account manually in RSA1 and using the hierarchy for reporting
Hi Luke,
Thanks for the reply.
But the note is only available with 1.0 level 6.
Do you suggest us to update to 6?
thanks!
Cheers,
Angelo
Hi Sudarshan
I have tested your scenario in my system. I am little surprised that config doesnt allow me to assign same valuation class to 2 different AREF (Account reference number/Account category reference).
Can you please check entries in OMSK and see if 1200 is linked to ZPQR or ZABC or both???
Can you also check the exititng ZABC material type with 1200 val class that what has happened to them when you made the change?
As far as impacts are concerned, I am assuming that not much has happened since you created new material type in terms of purchasing/postings then its fine to move the 1200 to ZABC via OMSK
Hi Appala
It seems you procured materials from your sub contractor, furnished it and developed a product which you now want to issue it back to the contractor.
You can simple use Outbound deliverey/goods issue to the subcontractor. You can register him as a vendor for procuring material and customer to issue material.
Are you expecting the program to check the check tables for you when you try to insert into the database? If so it won't work as when you do an ABAP insert into a database table it does not look at the associated check tables. You would have to do the checks yourself by doing a slect at the check table and branching the program.
Hi,
Because of i have missed the floor function formula giving you incorrect result.
Use below formula..This will give you the correct result. I have missed the Floor function for positive numbers. If you compare the old formula and new one floor is missing as highlighted.
=If([Column_Name]<>[Column]) Then "-"+FormatNumber(Floor([Column]/3600) ;"0") + ":" + FormatNumber(Floor(Mod([Column];3600)/60);"00") + ":" + FormatNumber(Mod(Mod([Column] ;3600) ;60) ;"00") Else FormatNumber(Floor([Column]/3600) ;"0") + ":" + FormatNumber(Floor(Mod([Column];3600)/60);"00") + ":" + FormatNumber(Mod(Mod([Column] ;3600) ;60) ;"00")
Regards,
Amit
Hello,
Please use 'SAP_SORG' evalutation path and also find sample code as below -
otype = ls_actor-otype
objid = ls_actor-objid .
CALL FUNCTION 'RH_STRUC_GET'
EXPORTING
act_otype = ls_actor-otype
act_objid = ls_actor-objid
act_wegid = 'SAP_SORG'
* ACT_INT_FLAG =
* ACT_PLVAR = ' '
act_begda = sy-datum
act_endda = sy-datum
* ACT_TDEPTH = 0
* ACT_TFLAG = 'X'
* ACT_VFLAG = 'X'
* AUTHORITY_CHECK = 'X'
* TEXT_BUFFER_FILL =
* BUFFER_MODE =
* IMPORTING
* ACT_PLVAR =
TABLES
result_tab = lt_actor_pos
RESULT_OBJEC = lt_result_objec
RESULT_STRUC = lt_result_struc
EXCEPTIONS
no_plvar_found = 1
no_entry_found = 2
OTHERS = 3.
IF sy-subrc = 1 OR sy-subrc = 3.
RAISE error_at_reading_om_data.
ENDIF.
APPEND LINES OF lt_actor_pos TO actor_tab.
ENDIF.
Note: lt_actor_pos => will return all postions and agent asigned to this org. lt_actor_struc => all org structure below this input org.
Hope this is helpful and let me know if anything.
Regards,
Arjun
