Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8667 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: delete duplicate entries with condition

$
0
0

Hi Nitin,

The above code will work fine but you must have forgotten to add a check for LV_HSLVT and WA_TABLE1-HSLVT equal to zero.

 

loop at it_glt0 INTO wa_glt0.

clear : wa_glt0_1

    READ TABLE it_glt0 INTO wa_glt0_1 WITH KEY racct= wa_table-racct drcrk = 'H'.

      move wa_table1-hslvtto lv_hslvt.

      CLEAR wa_glt0_1.

     READ TABLE it_glt0 INTO wa_glt0_1 WITH KEY racct= wa_table-racct drcrk = 'S'.

    if wa_table1-hslvt  eq 0 and lv_hslvt eq 0.

     delete it_table WHERE racct= wa_table-racct.

     ENDIF.

ENDLOOP.


Now the code will work fine


Re: SAP Portal 7.3 SPNego and NWBC SSO with ECC

$
0
0

Either define the IdP URL as a connection or set the global configuration setting AllowTemporaryConnections to true.

How to design this BO?

$
0
0

This picture shows the result which I want ,however,I don't konw how to design the BO! Can anybody help me ?

Best Regards!

Re: open dataset exception not triggered

$
0
0

If you check out the SAP Help, the SY-SUBRC = 8 means the app server was unable to open the file. 

 

In your dump does it mention the name of the class based exception that was raised? 

http://help.sap.com/abapdocu_702/en/abapopen_dataset.htm

 

For test purposes, you can set it to CX_ROOT and see what comes up.  Then change it to something more appropriate. CX_DYNAMIC_CHECK will only be raised for catchable exceptions caused during runtime. 

 

Hope that helps...

Re: Portfolio Item & Initiative - What is the difference?

$
0
0

Hi,

 

A portfolio item is used to represent a single idea, concept or project. An initiative is typically a very large project or program or initiative which can contain multiple portfolio items. That's a high level explanation, let me know if you have anything more specific in mind.

 

Lashan

Re: Need to Add Invoice table OINV to Collection report

$
0
0

Hi Nagarajan,

I'm not trying to get the DocTotal in the report, I was just putting it in the report as it was a feild I knew the valus and that way could prove if it was actually mapping to the correct invoice.  My problem is that I have proved it is not.  I need to get a UDF feild off the actual invoice  - the actual paydate.  I need to add it to the report so that the users can see when customers have agreed to pay the invoice.  Currently all that is happening is that I get a mapping to the first invoice created for each customer, the same one for each row of the report ie customer C00009 gets mapped to invoice 10006, customer c00011 gets mapped to invoice 100008, customer C00345 get mapped to invoice 13256 etc regardless of which invoices are listed for each customer.

 

Thanks

Re: Phase approval button

$
0
0

Does the approver have the right authorization to the project (in ACL) and is the project already locked?

Re: Split valuation issue for  material batch

$
0
0

Hi Shyam,

 

What is your Price indicator for semi finished good?

 

If it is S-Standard Price. Everytime GR is done Posting will be made based on Standard Price updated in Material master(thro Product Costing CK11n & CK24). So what is purpose of using batch based Split valuation if Invenotry(MAterial+Valuation type) is valued at same Price.

 

Assume that you are using Moving avg Price for Semi-finished Goods

If it is V-Moving avg Price -SAP already reconizes that there would be huge difference in valuation in production order , because of timing difference of Goods issue later than Goods receipt. This is already recomended to 'Not ' Use.

 

Batch based split valuation is for Purchased part... It should not be used for Manufactured parts/Semi finished goods.

 

It just provides addtional valuation , if Different purchased order has different price.

 

There is no value in activating this functionality even for procured parts, if you are not going to use this information further on where each of these differently valuated batch are used.

 

First ,identify what business requirement you are trying to address.

 

Best R,

Jatin


LSMW for asset deletion (AS06)

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I would like to delete asset no (physically delete asset) from tcode AS06, we have around 8000 records to be deleted, does anyone have any documentation LSMW for asset deletion (AS06) ? appreciate for your helps.

 

Regards,

 

Setiadi.

Re: To get Fiscal period based on Fiscal Year

$
0
0

Hi Arpan,

 

Have you tried mapping your date field to the FY period field in transformation?

try it and see if it works.

Thanks & regards,

Sudhir

Re: Check for Certain Text and remove from string

$
0
0

hi Mavis,

 

you can use the 'replace' function to do this...create a new formula with syntax similar to the following:

 

replace({your field},  "(InterCo)", "")

Intercompany Consolidations using Consolidation Source "Local Currency"

$
0
0

First of all I wish to thank everyone for their comments on this topic, but I still have some questions about:

  1. How the SAP system utilizes exchange rates for conversions.
  2. How “consolidations” are done in the SAP/IIS system and why a “currency exchange process” is               not followed for the consolidations.

 

Let me first of all review a recent Journal Entry I have recorded in SAP using one currency, how the SAP system converted the currency to record the JE in another currency and how the finished JE looks in the SAP system.

 

JE Recording

The JE was recorded into a UK localization database where the GBP (British Pound) is used for BOTH the “local” and “system” currencies.  The entry was to credit the Electric account of the British branch for USD 500.00 and charge one USA branch for USD 300.00 and another USA branch for USD 200.00 as follows:

 

JE Entry

The entry in USD (as a foreign currency) in the UK database was:

 

 

 

Debit (FC)

Credit (FC)

Electric

 

 

USD 500.00

Due from BR01

 

USD 300.00

 

Due from BR02

 

USD 200.00

 

 

Since the JE was recorded in a foreign currency in a UK localization, the system calculated the appropriate entries necessary to also record the entry in GBP, so the final entry was:

 

 

 

Debit

Credit

Debit (FC)

Credit (FC)

Electric

 

 

GBP 298.92

 

USD 500.00

Due from BR01

 

GBP 179.35

 

USD 300.00

 

Due from BR02

 

GBP 119.57

 

USD 200.00

 

 

The system used the exchange rate for GBP to USD as listed in the exchange rate from the Admin > Exchange Rates & Indexes.  The rate for the appropriate date was 1.6727 (for USD to GBP).  So the formula was for this process was:

 

  1. in USD / Exchange Rate (1.6727) = Amt. in GBP.

                                                or

USD 500.00 / 1.6727 = GBP 298.92 (and so on for the other USD amts.)

 

 

If this scenario is represented graphically, it would be as below:

 

(See Consol File 1)

 

Consolidations Process

After reading SAP documentation for the IIS on the consolidation topic in:

  • SAP version 9.0 Administration Guide (7/4/13)
  • SAP version 9.0 Users Guide (5/10/13)

 

I see the below paragraph in the” SAP B1 User Guide for Version 9.0” (page 119):

 

Consolidation Source–indicates whether the financial data for consolidation is retrieved from the company in the company’s local currency or in its system currency. Choose an option from the dropdown list. If you choose System Currency, the system assumes that the system currency is same as the consolidation currency (that is – Local Currency Code of the Consolidation Company).

 

The above comment refers to the Consolidation Setup done as part of the Company Details part of the Intercompany Landscape in the Administration Console.  (This is shown below.)

 

Company Registration and Landscape screen

  

(See Consol File 2)

 

 

 

Company Details screen for consolidations

 

(See Consol File 3)

 

You can select either “System Currency” or “Local Currency” in the “Consolidation Source” box shown above.

 

Although you are lead to believe that you can select either Local or System currency from the Consolidation Source, this is not technically correct.   If you closely read the comments in the User’s Guide for the “Consolidation Source” it is stated that, “ if you choose System Currency, the system assumes that the system currency is same as the consolidation currency (that is – Local Currency Code of the Consolidation Company).  As a result of reading this comment you are left to conclude that:

 

  1. If you actually want to perform the consolidations process, it has to be done according to the     instructions as set out in the User’s Guide:
    • You have to select the “System Currency” in the Consolidation Source
    • All of the “System Currencies” for all of the participating companies in the IIS have to be set to the same currency
    • This has to be the same currency used for the “Local Currency” of the Consolidation company

                There is basically no alternative to this process.

 

  1. I find the above to be very strange since the way in which the instructions for the Consolidation               Source are written you would be lead to believe that you can use “either” the “local currency”         or “system currency” to do the consolidations.  SAP has not even provided the instructions for a              user of IIS to use if they desire to consolidate using the “local currency” option.  If two options          are possible, then SAP should be providing the instructions for using either option.

 

  1. I would like to know why the “Currency Conversion Process” as detailed above cannot be used                 and applied to the Consolidations process when you are exporting and then importing the   Journal Entries (for companies participating in the IIS) into the Consolidation company. This                process would work as shown below.

 

               

JE Export/Import Process

This example uses the following assumptions:

Original JE recorded into UK database using the GBP for both “local” and “system” currencies.

The entry would be to credit the Electric account of the British branch for GBP 500.00 and charge one USA branch for GBP 300.00 and another USA branch for GBP 200.00 as follows:

 

JE Entry

The entry in GBP (in UK database) would be:

 

 

 

Debit

Credit

Electric

 

 

GBP 700.00

Due from BR01

 

GBP 500.00

 

Due from BR02

 

GBP 200.00

 

 

Since the JE was recorded in a local currency in a UK localization, the system would record the entry in the appropriate local currency Debit and Credit fields.

 

When this entry is exported (in GBP) to the Consolidation company (local currency = USD).  The import process would recognize the entry as being a “foreign currency” when compared to the local currency being used in the “local currency” of the Consolidation company (which is USD). 

 

When the system recognizes that the incoming JE is in a “foreign” currency, it would then perform the following procedures to record the JE:

  1. Locate the appropriate exchange rate to be used to convert the GBP amounts from the JE into                 the “local currency” of the Consolidation company database.
  2. The JE would then be recorded using the GBP part of incoming entry as the “foreign currency” part of the JE.  The system would also record the “converted” USD amounts of the transaction to   the regular “Debit” and “Credit” fields of the JE. The entry is shown below.

 

 

 

Debit

Credit

Debit (FC)

Credit (FC)

Electric

 

 

USD 1170.90

 

GBP 700.00

Due from BR01

 

USD 836.36

 

GBP 500.00

 

Due from BR02

 

USD 334.54

 

GBP 200.00

 

 

The system used the exchange rate for GBP to USD as listed in the exchange rate from the Admin > Exchange Rates & Indexes.  The rate for the appropriate date was 0.59783 (for GBP to USD).  So the formula was for this process was:

 

  1. in GBP / Exchange Rate (0.59783) = Amt. in USD.

                                                or

GBP 700.00 / 0.59783 = USD 1170.90Q (and so on for the other USD amts.)

Re: liveCache Installation on HANA

$
0
0

Hello Vipin,

Please let me know if the case was not resolved by you.

There were risently the SAP messages reported on the same issue.

Please check the steps 6, 7, 8 from the note 1825703.

Regards, Natalia Khlopina

Re: Unused Output types

$
0
0

Did you try in NAST table ?

 

For sales order in application give V1 for invoice input V3 and give the  created on range and input the respective output.

 

thanks,s

Srinu.

Failed to execute addon

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

 

The system is throwing an error message 'add-on execution failed' when I start the add-on in the addon manager. I am using SQL 2008 R2 std edition and SAP B1 9.0 PL10

 

The addon is built using vb.net and using B1DESetup_2.2_B190. The addon installer is also created using .net application.

 

When I run the addon application exe, it works fine. Then I create ard file and installed it in SAP B1 9.0 PL10.

 

In SAP B1, it is not working with such a strange error message.

 

Please provide me a solution to solve this problem. Thank you

 

 

Regards,

Steve


Re: Material Configurável x SPED e NFe

$
0
0

Prezados,

 

A identificação do código da NCM não se restringe às obrigações acessórias, pois ele é essencial na identificação de diversos tributos (exemplo IPI, PIS, COFINS...)

 

Toda classificação da NCM tem um código mais  “genérico” dentro do grupo,  entendo que caberia uma análise de uma equipe especializada e, que conheça bem o produto para efetuar esta análise. Importante unir esta pessoa com um profissional da área fiscal pois o código utilizado deve refletir a descrição do produto e a tributação correta, respectivamente.

 

Abraços,

 

Karen

Re: Updating an existing liveCache 7.9 installation in MSCS environment

$
0
0

Hello Vipin,

 

I was confused by the question:

"But I wanted to know, if still need to follow the same note, even to perform the Kernel update of liveCache 7.9, build 10 to iveCache 7.9, build 10."

A you planning to update just LCAPPS buiuld which were compiled with the same liveCache version?

 

In general please see the SAP note:

1855747 - Overview: Update of SAP MaxDB/liveCache/CS in MSCS environm.

< if Source Version 7.9 build x to Target version: 7.9 build y => 5. >

 

 

Regards, Natalia Khlopina

 

 

 

Re: MRP RUN- KIT BOM explosion not working

$
0
0

Hi

Thanks for your response. I reviewed all SAP notes and none of them are applicable to my scenario.

1808396 - BOM changes not considered by MRP: I have not changed BOMs.

1781324 - MD11: Valid BOM alternative is not found. We do not have alternative BOMs.

1791009 - No BOM explosion after changing production version: We am not using production versions.

  

Our Material KITS are PM spare assemblies set up as BOMs and consists of individual spare parts as components. We are creating purchase requisitions and not planned orders. We are not using PP functionality/Production orders.

MRP is generating purchase requisitions for KITS and components as per ROP and safety stocks. In other words it is working as expected.  The issue is BOMs which are parent assemblies are not exploding to the next lower level components.

Please note that I am not getting any error messages when MRP is executed.

Regards

Srini.

Re: change existing structure of pricing condition table

$
0
0

Yes. you are right better to create a new table with required combination and assign to your access sequence.

 

and also check if you have created some transaction data with this table combination then it is not advisable to delete the table better keep this table in last place(generic) of the access sequence.

thanks,

Srinu.

Re: o documento Devolução nao está contabilizando a entrada no estoque

$
0
0

Jaqueline, esta é a primeira vez que está sendo movimentado este item? Ele foi cadastrado recentemente?

 

Caso as respostas sejam sim, então o seu problema é que este item não possui em seu cadastro valor informado como custo.

 

O campo custo do item (por preço médio) em seu cadastro, só é alterado por movimentos do módulo "Compras" ou por movimentos de entrada no módulo "Estoque".

 

Desta forma como você está entrando o item por "Devolução" em vendas, nenhum custo será registrado.

 

Para resolver você deve fazer uma reavaliação de estoque após adicionar a devolução assim o custo para o item será definido e depois será possível fazer sua saída, através da "Entrega". Uma vez definido valor no campo custo do cadastro do item, todas as movimentações de "Devolução" seguintes terão contabilização.

 

Espero ter colaborado.

Estou a disposição para auxiliar caso algo não dê certo.

Abraço,

Rodrigo da Costa Feula

Viewing all 8667 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images