Hi Goda.
Yes, i know 3 companies that have huge Z developments to face actual costing. I activated ML in one of them and in the 2 others i worked in upgrades. Something that i dont see in this Z is a actual cost component split, guess because its complexity.
I create a post about this some time ago.
Short History: Do you know there are companies that have Z programs to calculate Actual Cost ?
BigChoi also said he know companies in Korea that develop this kind of Z.
Keep in mind the following, actual costing depends on your bussiness requirements and regulations. Under certain circumstances, you can accomplish actual costin working with MAP "V" and with good procedures, but if you want full cost absortion of indirect cost (activities) at period end closing, valuate COGS at actuals, have multilevel production,...its better to activate ML.
If you plan create a Z, at least think of 2 months development.. and lots of month correcting issues.
Arturo.