Hello experts,
Whenever I login to SBO Client, the system shows a message (pic attached). Could you please help me how can I fix it?
Regards,
Hello experts,
Whenever I login to SBO Client, the system shows a message (pic attached). Could you please help me how can I fix it?
Regards,
from where did you pick the terms "BSK code" and "Released with Restrictions" ?
they are quite uncommon to me.
Batch status is a radio button in the batch master, and it can either be restricted or unrestricted.
And based on customizing settings you can control whether restricted stock can be used e.g. as consumption in rework. It is not possible to sell restricted batches.
Hi All,
Business is able to create more than one Transfer order for the same outbound delivery qty.
For example
outbound delivery for 150 qty,
First TO created for 150 qty and confirmed , GI done..
Scenond TO created with same qty and not able to confirm and delete..
Now the stock status is given below...The actual WM stock should be 25..
Guide us how to bring the stock to actual..
When we try the same scenorio in quality system, as per the standard sap after first TO created , we are not able to create and throwing error, but in production user created...
Thanks,
Muru
Hi Ananthi,
In which program you are getting error, is this field is in hide status or not.
Regards,
Kedhar.
what are the wage types posted through OBYG t code ,which are to be posted credit side of balance sheet a/c?
can you post detialed error from job erro rlog, also try to run the job with SQL loader and reader trace on for more details
Hi Sean,
Yes we could able to resolve the issue for this object HRCUS_T_PC2U7 .
Steps.
--------
1. Get the object Key from SAP for Table Type HRCUS_T_PC2U7
( R3TR TTYP HRPAYUS_T_TXIT)
2. SE11-->select data type-->HRCUS_T_PC2U7-->create-->select Table Type
3. For Short Text : Table Type of TAX_LGART
For Line Type enter PC2U7
4. Save to package : PC10
5. Activate HRCUS_T_PC2U7
Thanks
Subra
Hi there,
We have the following business scenario among 2 company codes. We are wondering how we can automate this with GTM.
------>Purchasing Flow------>
Company code A-->Company code B---> Vendor
<-----Sales Flows<----------
A- Inquiry/Quotation Flow
1. Company code A creates inquiry to Company code B
2. Company code B creates inquiry to vendor
3. Company code B receives quotation from vendor
4. Company code A receives quotation from company code B
B - Purchasing/sales flow
1. Company code A creates PO to Company code B
2. Company code B creates PO to vendor
3. Company code B receives goods and invoice from vendor
4. Company code A receives goods and invoice from Company code B
I understand that it might be possible to use a trading contract to automate the purchasing/sales flow between the 3 parties. Am I right?
1. Is it also possible to automate the creation of the trading contract based on the PO created in company code A?
2. Is it possible to automate the inquiry/quotation process flow?
I look forward to any information that might be useful to automate the trading process.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards,
how many line items are there??? and what are the quantities ??
Padarti Venkata Koteswara Rao,,
1) is there any other standard report to check the vendor invoices updated with barcode?
No. You don't have a standard report for BRCDE displaying. You can go to BSEG-ESRNR and BSEG - ESRRE.
2) How can we achieve the solution for multiple invoices with single Boleto screnario.
Go to F-51 and clear all invoices against single one then you can enter the barcode.
If you prefer customizing change you can define FBZP -> payment method in company code -> Single payment for marked item (flag off). Assign barcode for all invoices and execute F110.
best regards
Nah...still doesn't work for me.
HI. Did you find the resolution yet ? I have the same issue.
Regards.
thanks Marc!
I would have expected another answer as you can imagine
can u explain how you install it?
Where u find that file?
I have the same error and its getting me crazy after trying two days of troubleshooting..
Ok, that's SAP Invoice Management by OpenText addon. OSS has a precious few notes concerning installation of addon or upgrade of SAP Systems containing this addon (found using search term OTEXVIM):
1920804 - SAP Invoice Management by OpenText support for EhP7
1721041 - SAP Invoice Management by OpenText support for EhP6
1262124 - Vendor key handling in ERP Enhancement Packages 3 and 4
1353761 - SAP Invoice Management by Open Text 5.2
1143354 - SAP Invoice Management by Open Text
They concern for the most part only the compatibility of OT releases with SAP releases; you'll not find information on how the Open Text BADI implementations should be handled during upgrades, how they should be named, etc. That info may, however, be contained in something called "OpenText Vendor Invoice Management x.x.x. - Configuration Guide" documents - I came across one such document in google search.
If documentation does not help, I'd suggest to contact OpenText support. If that is not an option, or if there is time pressure, I'd handle it just like any other custom BADI implementation first - meaning, create it under any name in customer namespace and test, if the functionality if ok. Then, when the info from Open Text comes - do as they say.
cheers
Janis
my email id : sreenivas.sapsd1@gmail.com
Maintain percentages in FB02 on document change screen or OBB8 maintain Payment terms.
regards
Hi
You can also check here
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000981952011E/index.htm
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000934882011E
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000934902011E
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000931932011E
https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000935022011E
hope this helps.
Regards
Prakhar
Hi Ajay,
your hints have been very valuable.
The correction has been performed in SAP.
From my point of view it looks correct.
In Depreciation area 30 shouldn't be calculated any depreciation. I wanna check as well in reporting modules will it be ok.
I have attached corrected fields in depreciation area 30. If you can take a look whether you agree with me about correctness of currect status of case ?
Thanks a lot for your support
Hi,
Unfortunately RSECNOTE isn't as accurate as it could be right now so you should use system recommendations & https://service.sap.com/securitynotes to derive your list