Nope, having a non perpetual Inventory wouldn't post any inventory Transactions. there will be no COGS accounting
Sandy
Re: SAP Business One Goods Issue Problem
↧
↧
Re: Changing username(identity) in IdM when infotype 0105 system id changes
Hi All... just wanted to give you all a heads up on this as believe we have worked out the solution. The way to solve this issue would be to ...
First, in infotype 105 delimit the old username record with yesterday’s date and second open a new 105 record for the new username valid from today’s date.
Thanks for all your input/support
Ran
↧
Re: Return with MAP
Hi Dee Dee,
In case of returns to vendor system uses the price from PO.
So system behavior is correct.
Regards,
Szymon
↧
Re: Form-16, acknowledgement receipts numbers are not appearing ONLY for those employees who has non taxable income.
Thanks Balwant.
Yes, You are ryt.
.
Many thanks for reply.
Regards,
Rajneesh
↧
Re: Outgoing error
Hello Ram
If you are making initial payment i.e., making payment for the first time partially then go to partial tab and click on it. you will get the one more field under partial tab, double click on it, the amount what you have entered will be adjusted against assigned.
if it is final payment of partial then you can clear in standard payment method itself.
kindly confirm.
Thanks in advance
↧
↧
Re: Form-16, acknowledgement receipts numbers are not appearing ONLY for those employees who has non taxable income.
Hi Deepak,
Many thanks for reply.
Regards,
Rajneesh
↧
Re: Automating Report Creation and Distribution in B1
I am thinking to use Visual Cut to create separate Pdfs and email at runtime. I am looking at other alternatives as well but was wondering if it is doable using B1 SDK.
↧
adhoc query selection issue
Hi,
When I use Adhoc query if "switch on object selection", found there's no selection option for IT2011(refer to screenshot), who do you know why, how to correct it?
↧
Installation of DS 4.2 SP2 crashed half way. Unable to start setup again.
Hi all,
While installing the DS 4.2 SP2, it crashed half way during the installation (right before the web deployment).
Meaning now I can start the designer and logon to the cms but the web is not deployed yet so I am not able to go into the admin console.
So I have tried to go to Program and Features there to try for a repair but it fail. It shows error: " The installer detected there is a problem in the install manifest. You cannot proceed with the current installation. The problem may be caused by a previous installation operation that did not complete. Please run the installer again from the original media to resolve this problem."
OK fine, so I run the setup from the original media but it just wouldn't show up. I see in the task manager both "setup.exe" and "setupengine.exe" is there but nothing comes up.
Anyone know the solution please advise?
Thanks you.
↧
↧
Re: Question about the function module (RFC_READ_TABLE)
Hi, Fred-san
Thank you again for your information on this.
Yes, I agree that the data in VBAP and EKKO are also important, and we shouldn't let
the competitors to have access to those data in our system.
But I was not sure how those competitors can execute the query with RFC_READ_TABLE in our
system...
I mean, they don't even have a SAP account for our system...
So what you were saying was that if someone (=competitors) catches the data which is being
trasfered over internet while our users are executing RFC_READ_TABLE, it would cause a security risk?
Anyhow, I felt that we need to be very very careful for using RFC_READ_TABLE.
So I will not use this function module in the report this time.
Thank you
Takashi
↧
Re: Validating the dd-mm and Year data in webui???
Hi,
Sorry for my Late reply..
Thanks for your suggestions. Today i will try to use the above scenarios and let you know if i am able to achieve my requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Bala.
↧
Need an Invoice Copy
Hi All,
Our Customer needs an invoice copy for already billed document. I checked the output in VF03 but no output has been maintained for it. Even in the delivery document no Output has been triggered.No Output Condition record also exists for this.
So how can we generate an invoice copy for already Billed document?
Even for proforma invoice it is necessary to maintain output determination procedure?
Is there any way to generate invoice copy for this billing document?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Manjunath
↧
Re: Where to see Forecast in ECC released from APO DP
Hi Maddy,
Can you check below tables, and check if you are able to see desired data.
PBIM Independent requirements for material
PBED Independent requirement data
PBHI Independent requirement history
PBIV Independent requirement index
PBIC Independent requirement index for customer req.
Rgds
Sourabh
↧
↧
Re: How do we make payments in a currency other than the invoice currency
HI Mahesh,
While posting the Invoice you will have option in second tab "Payment Curr" Mention the USD curr here and run F110 it should work.
Along with this you will also have to do the configuration mentioned by Vinod in FBZP which will allow this payment currency with valid PM and house bank.
Thanks,
↧
Offline bidding output is not interactive form
Hi, experts:
About offline biding, I finished the necessary configure and operation as below:
- Customizing Business Function Switches for Offline Bidding
- Offline Bidding Proxy Settings
- Offline Bidding Encryption and Digital signature Settings
- Offline Bidding User and User Mail Id Settings
- Configuration of Offline Bidding Adobe Form
- Configuration of Permit Offline Bidding Check in Transaction types
- Configuration of Permit Offline Bidding Check in Bidder master
but the RFx output is not offline bidding, still is smartform. as the below picture. So, the supplier's mail attachment must not be interactive form.
what's problem or what is missed?
I hope to get your help .
thanks
Jesse.
↧
Re: Copy of Inspection Result
I think you have to develop "BAdI for selection of results data for copy of results".
After develop and activate new BAdI, a dialog box appears, in which you can choose "Selection procedure" in customizing.
I'm not sure it will work or not.
Regards
↧
Re: Why does owner can not save after schedule run report in WebI?
Hi,
Answer of your question is A Webi report instance is Read Only. Hence it cannot be overwritten. This behavior is by design.
Check the attached SAP Note.
1560350 - Error WIS 30950 when saving a scheduled Web Intelligence Instance
↧
↧
Re: WebI and Rich client report inconsistency
Try to reconnect to universe in report using Change Data Source.
Also try creating ad-hoc report from BI Launch pad pulling same objects and see you are getting same error
↧
Re: SAP Solution Manager on Windows 2012 + SQL Server 2012
Srivastava,
I adjusted the hostname server up to 13 characters and reinstalled the SAP Solution Manager, but now with kernel 721_EXT, and the Application is running.
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
Fábio Belli
↧
Re: SOD Rules - Query
Hi Alessandro,
Please find my functions, risk and rules below.
Function AR12 - No Actions only Permissions
Function CA04 - Actions
Function CA04 - Permissions
Action Rules
Permission Rules
My Role 1 has Tcodes and objects which are part of CA04 function
My Role 2 has objects which are part of AR12 function.
When I checked by simulating Role 1 and Role 2, I am getting Action Level risks as well as Permission Level risks.In my action level rules of CCI02 I observe that rules are defined for Permission Group of AR12 with Actions of CA04. These are showing up as Action level risks 
Here I should get permission level risks only and not action level risks
When i run risk analysis for Role 1 alone,risk analysis report shows that Role 1 has Action level risks from my Risk ID CCI02
In my action level rules of CCI02 I observe that rules are defined for Permission Group of AR12 with Actions of CA04. But these rules are making Role 1 itself as a risk role which is incorrect as Tcodes of role 1 don't have any issues. Only when they combine with role 2 should show permission level risks.
I understand that any combination will appear as risk between AR12 and CA04.
But why are action level rules being created when there are actions only one function and other function don't have any actions.
Even if they are getting created, that should again be considered as a combination but these action rules are making individual Tcodes which are part of CA04 as risk Tcodes.
Can you please help me to understand this?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sai.
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
