Hi,
After BODS upgrade to 4.2 from 4.0, I was testing "view design time data" and everything looked okay until I use lookup function in the where clause. View design time data is not able to filter data based on simple lookup I have given. Is it bug in BODS or only simple conversion functions will work with view design time data option?
Appreciate any help! thanks.
Hi
Has any body explored displaying statuses for OCR posted invoices or Open text invoices in SNC.This looks as a major gap in the standard as there many countries where where invoice collaboration is still not permitted legally,
I don't see any easy way out of this problem (=having two substitutions for same dates. The table key effectively prevents every attempt.
I would probably just add an error message instructing that "You cannot set the same user as substitute for several profiles starting at the same date" (and some kind of hint, that they could actually change the begin date (one day earlier or whatever). Better than nothing and should be easy to implement.
Regards,
Karri
Hello Amrith,
As you rightly told, SQL would be a good option. Try querying on SYS.object_dependencies.
Please try the code below:(this is what we normally do.
..)
Select distinct BASE_OBJECT_NAME from SYS.object_dependencies
where (DEPENDENT_OBJECT_NAME LIKE 'sap.hba.ecc/BOMHeader/BillOfMaterial/hier/BillOfMaterial')
and BASE_OBJECT_TYPE = 'TABLE'
and DEPENDENT_OBJECT_TYPE = 'VIEW'
order by BASE_OBJECT_NAME ASC
Please note that here am using the view --> sap.hba.ecc/BOMHeader/BillOfMaterial/hier/BillOfMaterial
Hope this helps.
PS: This has already been discussed elsewhere..Please do a basic search before posting..
BR
Prabhith
Hello Experts,
I'm trying to understand how to establish a link between the partner function and the case partners(Processor and Person Responsible).
The parties involved tab is not getting populated when the processor and person responsible are maintained in the header.
Cheers,
SB
Hi ,
I have a requirement of implementing a IPC pricing user exit for the below requirement. I have two condition types ZABC as $10 and ZXYZ as 20% which calculates the total as $12. Instead of adding 20% to $10 i want to write a custom logic to calculate a different value on $10 to get a diffferent value instead of $12 which is standard.
Do we implement in condition value user exit and how do implement the logic.
Hello Dean,
This is not possible if you mapping multi-feeder system to same logical system group.
Field /SAPSLL/TCOOGS-GRVSY is logical system group not logical system.
This is N:1 situation, it is not possible to use right 1 to find out left N.
Best regards,
Vincent
Hi Ivor,
SAP KBA (Knowledge Base Article) means the SAP OSS note number, which in this case is 1820513
I would suggest you to show the SAP KBA to your BASIS person and then ask him\her to activate the EA-PLM BFS through SFW5. If there are any pre-requisites assigned to the activation, then they would be able to help you out.
Thanks,
Amlan
Hello, I have a question about multiprovider. let's say i have 2 dsos and one multiprovider on top of them.
DSO1 has following fields.
Material Payment terms Amount
100 ZPT2 $100
DSO2 has following fields.
Material Payment terms Customer Amount
100 ZPT2 101 $100
I will check Customer for DSO2 at MP level because i only have it in DSO2
Now If I create a report and drag Customer in it.
Would I get the following format?
| Material | Payment terms | Customer | Amount |
100 ZPT2 101 $100
or
Material Payment terms Customer Amount
100 ZPT2 $100
100 ZPT2 101 $100
Please let me know.
Thanks.
Thanks Yariv, still not working for me unfortunately... I think it will be an issue with my account as I've been plagued with a few problems before where support have said "its because I have an old account"... However that can be a problem?!? ;-)
I don't want to just create a new trial account though as the current one is somehow tied to my SCN login and I don't want to be plagued with continual SCN logon issues again... It seems very fragile for me.
Hi Rahul,
You should add more space to thelll system & extend the Table space PSAPS3 accordingly to avoid any space related issues during the proocess.
Gaurav
Hi All,
It seems like every weekend our bo db down because of this error.
The I/O error will trigger the oracle db services down.
We are using BO 4.1, SAN disk and oracle 11g.
Appreciate for some light on this issue. Below are the error log:
Sat May 16 15:02:30 2015
KCF: read, write or open error, block=0x238 online=1
file=3 'E:\ORADATA\DATAFILE\BOREPO\UNDOTBS01.DBF'
error=27070 txt: 'OSD-04016: Error queuing an asynchronous I/O request.
O/S-Error: (OS 1117) The request could not be performed because of an I/O device error.'
Errors in file D:\ORACLE\diag\rdbms\borepo\borepo\trace\borepo_dbw2_4256.trc:
Errors in file D:\ORACLE\diag\rdbms\borepo\borepo\trace\borepo_dbw2_4256.trc:
ORA-63999: data file suffered media failure
ORA-01114: IO error writing block to file 3 (block # 568)
ORA-01110: data file 3: 'E:\ORADATA\DATAFILE\BOREPO\UNDOTBS01.DBF'
ORA-27070: async read/write failed
OSD-04016: Error queuing an asynchronous I/O request.
O/S-Error: (OS 1117) The request could not be performed because of an I/O device error.
DBW2 (ospid: 4256): terminating the instance due to error 63999
Thanks.
Hello All
Legal change for ‘Form 16: Sec 80CCE Limit Changed to 1.5 Lacs’ has been released for customers with following notes:
2169439 - For releases 470 and 500
2167136 - For releases 600 and above
Please refer to the solution part of the SAP notes to apply the changes.
Thanks and Kind Regards
Ramana
All, need help on the below quality scenario...
here is the master data for the scenario I'm having issues with:
(1) material master has inspection type 01 active, QM in procurement active, and QM control key 0007 (we want to block the invoice until QC releases to unrestricted)
(2) quality info record has release until 12/31/2030,
a. inspection active for vendor XXX, no existing or vendor QM systems set, no status profile, and no quality agreements
b. no inspection for vendor YYY, no existing or vendor QM systems set, no status profile, and no quality agreements
c. no inspection for vendor ZZZ, , no existing or vendor QM systems set, no status profile, and no quality agreements
PO creation for vendor YYY or vendor ZZZ shows stock type of "Quality Inspection" even thou the QINF record for those vendors are no inspection. It looks like PO creation is not even considering the quality info record at all. Is there any config somewhere that I need to complete? Is this drived by the config of movement types or something else?
I have checked everything and I do not see what I'm missing here. I have looked thru existing notes and support documents but they reference mostly to when there's a status profile or quality agreements and I do not have any of that.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Aida
Hi Dominic,
Please refer to Installation guide of SAP Replication Server SP200.
You can find it at Infocenter.
Thanks,
Jongun Seo
Hi Ricardo,
Check in your project reference.
Either you use
SAPBusinessOneSDK.dll
OR
SAPbouiCOm + SAPbobsCOM.dll
Do not use both in the same project.
B1Studio for 9.1 will reference SAPBusinessOneSDK by default, no need to add SAPbouiCOM and/or SAPbobsCOm
Regards
Edy
You can disregard the previous reply. I commented out this code:
protectedvoidPage_UnLoad(object sender,EventArgs e)
{
try
{
rpt.Close();
rpt.Dispose();
}
catch{}
}
After getting rid of this code, I looked through the Session["Report"] variable again and it is no longer null.
Interestingly, Page_UnLoad is being called BEFORE even getting to the parameter entry. If rpt.Close(); is dumping all references to rpt, then it's as if the Session variable is acting like a pointer, instead of storing an actual rpt object. So when rpt is Disposed(), Session["Report"] appears to just be a null pointer.
So now it with the right stuff being passed around... it still has the infinite 'document processing' screen.
Dear Patra,
Thanks for your message.
I don't think the case is related with sapnote 2069224. When we display the accounting document by FB03, the field Purchasing Document is already be optional.
The case is when check down payment document in PO history, the PO assigned is different with PO displayed.
Any idea?
Thanks before.
Best regards,
Rosida
Dear Tasha,
Please review note
I hope this helps.
Thanks & Kind Regards,
Anil
Message was edited by: William Eastman
Hi ,
do not insert any value(not even prefixed with ^!) in action, while creating functions from NWBC. you can see values in file for 'Function action' prefixed with ^!, after you download org. rules.
i have successfully created Critical Permission risks, by only providing values in Permission tab of function
provide error screenshot of saving Critical Permission risks
Regards
plaban
